enginehistory.org Forum Index enginehistory.org
Aircraft Engine Historical Society Members' Bulletin Board
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Automatic engine controls

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    enginehistory.org Forum Index -> Technical Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jjuutinen



Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 180

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:13    Post subject: Automatic engine controls Reply with quote

Just been wondering how far behind US engine makers were in introducing automatic engine controls to even ti their fighter engines. E.g. even late designs like the F8F had much higher pilot workload than comparable German aircraft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jschauer



Joined: 19 May 2004
Posts: 93
Location: Justin, Texas

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 13:21    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't answer that question, but I suspect the reason we didn't have it was due to mass production reasons, i.e. they didn't want to disrupt the production lines to add a new system or spend time testing the system. Look at the BA series of the R-3350 used in the B-29 as an example. It was a relatively new engine put in to production before all of the testing was completed. Another example was the building of the atomic bomb. The factories that produced the fission materials were built before they knew what was going to be put in the buildings. They had a general idea, but no definative plans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jjuutinen



Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 180

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 21:07    Post subject: Reply with quote

That explanation does work for the major series produced ones, but even late desigs when did not really have such urgency like the F8F, F7F failed to have the level of automation that was available in German aircraft by the beginning of the war. What is interesting is that aircraft with radials had fewer automatics than those with the Allison or the Merlin. The same difference applies to British designs. E.g. the Seafire 47 had fully automatic oil and coolant rads, mixture control (those with the Griffon 88 had no mixture lever) etc. Consider that the early Bf 109F was already a near true single engne lever airplane as the prop pitch change was by a throttle mounted toggle switch and a normal flight could be executed without touching the switch.

The Jumo 213 had also interesting engine controls. It had "charge mass" control. I.e. when e.g. the TO setting was selected, the rpm remained fixed but the boost varied according to the ambient temperature, allways delivering the same air mass to cylinders.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    enginehistory.org Forum Index -> Technical Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group